Are the Sith all bad?

Do the Sith get a pretty raw deal? Constantly labelled as the bad guys the Sith have to sit back and watch as the Jedi swan around like the proverbial golden child.

Sure there are some bad eggs in the Sith order and no one is condoning genocide, oppression and blowing up the odd planet or two. Let's face it Darth Sidious has some serious underlying issues. But what if the balance between Good and Bad, Jedi and Sith wasn't so clear. What if the basis on which the Sith are founded was no more or less evil than the Jedi. What if we look at a few key factors 'from a certain point of view?'


The Jedi wanted control of the Republic
Pay attention, the Jedi were going to take control of the senate in Episode 3. Mace Windu himself declares Palpatine must be removed from power if he does not step down after Grievous is killed. Why? Palpatine may have played the game somewhat to get elected as Chancellor and then ensure the senate gave him executive powers. However it was all done democratically. To remove him with no vote, no discussion. Is that not a coup?

Windu with his version of fair justice

Even once Anakin tells Windu of Palpatine's true identity he still doesn't have any actual proof. Just the opinion of a slightly deluded, unstable young man. Yet he marches in to Palpatine's office and tries to kill him. Which brings me to another point. Aren't the Jedi all about compassion and doing things the right way but here is one of their Grand Masters trying to execute a political leader with no trial. Not very gentlemanly at all from a Jedi who has an impenetrable aura of passive aggressive.


Competition is healthy
The Sith believe conflict is the only true test of one's ability and the challenge conflict gave forced individuals and civilisations to grow and evolve.

This is simply an evolution of the survival of the fittest theory. It is also the reason the Jedi became almost extinct. By refusing to challenge themselves and grow and evolve they limited their ability while the Sith constantly pushed the boundaries of what is possible with the force and how it is used. As the saying goes 'Evolve or Die.'


How many clones died?
Yes Sidious may have had a role in the forming of the clone army but it was the Jedi who sent hundreds of thousands of them to their death.

Why didn't they supplement their army with droids to lessen the human / clone death toll? Surely with the wealth of the Republic they could have developed an army of droids equal to the Confederacy's Commando droids. Led by clone troopers the Grand Army would have been equally as effective with a much lower loss of life. Instead they just ordered them to their death.

Evidently for Jedi all life is not equal.


Why show no emotion?
The corner stone of the Sith's belief system was around emotions and the power they gave. Anger, Hatred and Fear may have been the perceived by the Jedi as negative emotions but by definition you must care about something deeply to be able to have these feelings. The emotions of anger, hate and fear are also extremes of very normal, emotions of love and caring.

By not caring how would you ever value what you fight for. Sith use their emotions to focus and strengthen their use of the force. As we all know, some who fights because they care is infinitely more powerful than a mercenary who doesn't care.

Surely Anakin turned to the dark side because he wanted to protect Padme. Now we all know that led to some pretty dark moments but his intention was to save his wife. How can loving someone be bad, for most people surely it makes them stronger not weaker

Someone who doesn't allow people to love doesn't sound like a shining beacon to us.


The rule of two
One of the corner stones of the Sith belief was there where only ever be two, a master and an apprentice. By enforcing this the control of power was much greater. Rather than having hundreds of powerful, force sensitive beings running around you have two. How many rogue Sith do you hear of? How many Jedi went rogue?

There were Dark Jedi, yet they like their light side counterparts weren't as powerful as the Sith. They couldn't focus the force through their emotions.

There's no doubt that by 40BBY the Jedi were generally compassionate and powerful peace keepers and the Sith were scheming to take control of the galaxy. Yet they are two sides to the same coin. It's clear the Sith started as force sensitives who embraced their passion and emotions. It's also clear the Jedi were not the whiter than white, monks they would like to appear as.

A clear subject this is not.

Why not give your opinions below in the comments box.

Who would wear a helmet like this?

It's a good question and one that immediately sprung to mind on looking at the Wired.com gallery of props from The Force Awakens. As you'd expect there are loads of First Order Stormtrooper helmets, updated blaster rifles and pistols that look like they've been made from scraps in a junk yard. There were also buckets of the new X-Wing pilot helmets (pun intended.)

In a number of different colour ways the new helmets looks just what you'd expect from an evolution of the classic rebel pilot's helmet we're so familiar with. My personal favourite is the white, blue and yellow with the classic Biggs chequer board design.

For many people though the inclusion of an original style rebel X-Wing helmet will have largely gone unnoticed. But it raises questions, why is it here? Whose is it? If the Resistance has new equipment including helmets who's the old stick in the mud who is still wearing an old helmet like this?

Could it be someone who hasn't had much contact with anyone for a couple of decades? Where ever Luke is hidden away, could he have taken an X-Wing to park up in the garage and polish? How great would it be to see Luke charge back in to the fray at the helm of his old skool X-Wing.  The colours on the helmet may be different to what we're used to but I'm pretty sure there aren't too many Resistance pilots in their new fancy X-Wings with the old bucket on their head.

Perhaps the inclusion of this helmet gives a subtle nod to the fact Luke has been out of touch for a few years. Whatever the reasoning and the ultimate story line what we can be assured of is the new Star Wars universe will look the part.

One of the key factors that cemented the original Star Wars films in our hearts was how beat-up everything looked. The Falcon looked like it had a few parking lot dings and the X-Wings definitely gave the feeling they had had a tough innings. Thankfully it looks like we're back in this second hand world. Gone is the polished, shiny finish of the prequel trilogy and back is the worn out, dusted up galaxy we all love.

Head over to www.wired.com to see the full gallery including Captain Phasma's helmet and blaster and Kylo Ren's awesome cross guard lightsaber.

Is Luke the Supreme Leader?

Ok bear with me, this is another crackpot internet theory with no basis and no 'insider knowledge'. Because of this it's probably total and utter rubbish. Probably.

But let's just have a look at the evidence to be on the safe side eh.

So there has been plenty written online about whether Luke Skywalker is actually Kylo Ren and do you know what there's some evidence that could back this up. But do I think he is? No, and to find out why feel free to go and watch the ace Collider Jedi Council who explain it perfectly.

But it got me thinking...

The Vader helmet

It's assumed Kylo Ren is the one holding Vader's helmet in the trailers but how do we know this? Does it not make more sense that the person with Vader's mask is the only person who was at Vader's funeral? How would anyone find the helmet otherwise?

If a funeral happens in a forest with only one person, do people know where to look?

What if it's Skywalker / Snoke holding the disfigured helmet of the Sith Lord? Is Kylo Ren on board to carry out Luke's bidding, is he related to Luke? Just because we hear what we think is Kylo Ren talking doesn't mean he's the mastermind.

Is this 'released' image a decoy in typical JJ style?

The power!!!

Ok so at the start of ROTJ we have three powerful force users. By the end of the movie we're down to one. So one person, the son of the chosen one, the son of a man with a definite dark streak a mile wide, even when he was playing for the Jedis.

Does three in to one go?

Is it not inconceivable the power got to Luke, haunted by his father's legacy he also turns to the dark side? Who would stop him?  Plenty of great men have fallen for temptation.

Following on from this, if Luke had gone to the dark side would he really be taking orders from someone else. No, in my opinion if Luke did take the red pill he is definitely the leader (Snoke) not the apprentice (Kylo Ren).

Where's Luke (and Snoke)?

JJ and Disney have been so careful to keep Luke and Snoke out of any of the promotional material. Is this a coincidence? JJ has recently said that Luke's absence from promotional material is to protect the plot line not a marketing ploy. From this we must assume that by seeing Luke it would reveal a major spoiler. Surely this must relate to his visual appearance.

Is Andy Serkis just a decoy to draw attention from Luke? It certainly wouldn't be the first time JJ Abrams has tried to pull the wool over people's eyes. Remember Star Trek In To Darkness?

In the second trailer released we hear Luke say "the force is strong in my family, my father has it, I have it blah blah blah." Notice the wording 'my father HAS it', present tense, not past. What if Vader / is still influencing Luke from beyond the grave to finish his work. 

Anakin's lightsaber

Similar to the Vader mask, who else would even know where to start looking? In the expanded universe there was a tale that it got caught in an air vent in Cloud City was found by a maintenance crew and eventually made its way back to Vader. If Luke / Snoke doesn't have his lightsaber back maybe he's is really attached to it and is sending the might of the First Order to retrieve it. 

Starkiller base

Another massive clue or a red herring. Anyone with more than a passing knowledge of Star Wars knows in early drafts of Star Wars there was a character called Annikin Starkiller who filled a Luke / Anakin style role in the story (Luke Skywalker was an old Jedi in the Obi-wan mould). George Lucas only changed in later versions to Luke Skywalker.being what we now know. Is it coincidence that they've now used this name for the First Order's HQ? Is it a simple nod to history? Many of the designs being used in Rebels are inspired by the original Ralph Mcquarrie designs. Is this just a neat little reference to George Lucas' original tale? 

Annikin Starkiller

As a young journalist I was once told there is no such thing as a coincidence.  In this case I'm inclined to agree. 

So was Aunt Beru right, does Luke have too much of his father in him? It's an outside chance but there is definite evidence that Luke could be the Supreme Leader of the First Order and in the 30 years between ROTJ and TFA there has been one major slide to the dark side for the Rebellion's golden boy. 

If you're doubting whether the simple moisture farmer from Tatooinecan be evil, just consider who Mark ham ill's other big character is. None other than the comedian of chaos himself, the Joker. Hamill can definitely do evil, in fact he has gone on record as saying he suggested to George Lucas that it would make a more interesting angle if Luke went bad.

Hell I've even managed to persuade myself. Brace yourselves folks, Luke really is Supreme Leader Snoke. You heard it at Rule of Two first.

Let me know what you think in the comments box below.